Monday, 26 October 2026

AI layoffs: Airbnb and Palantir CEOs say who keeps their job

Brian Chesky says pure people managers are most at risk. Alex Karp says your best bets are a trade or a brain that works differently. Here is what holds up.

An empty open-plan office with laptops on desks

The short version

  • Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky says workers who refuse to adapt to AI, and managers who only manage, face the biggest layoff risk.
  • Palantir CEO Alex Karp says vocational training or being neurodivergent are the two clearest signs a worker has a future with AI.
  • An autistic psychologist says Karp has a point about different thinkers, but no data shows neurodivergent workers as a group will do better.
  • Both CEOs lead companies that profit from AI, and neither announced new hiring policies with their comments.
Quick read · 1 min

Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky and Palantir CEO Alex Karp have both weighed in on who survives the AI job shake-up. Chesky says the biggest risk is refusing to adapt, and that managers who only supervise will lose out to leaders who also do hands-on work. He thinks learning AI tools is easy for anyone willing to keep learning.

Karp points to two safer routes: a trade, or being neurodivergent, such as having ADHD, autism or dyslexia. A psychologist who is autistic says he has a point about valuing different thinkers, but no data shows neurodivergent workers as a group will do better.

  • Palantir's neurodivergent fellowship pays $110,000 to $200,000.
  • Neither CEO announced new hiring rules.
  • Learning AI tools and keeping hands-on skills is the common advice.

Two of tech’s best-known bosses have spent the past few days telling workers who will make it through the AI shake-up. Airbnb’s Brian Chesky says the people in most danger aren’t the ones AI can copy, but the ones who refuse to change. Palantir’s Alex Karp went further: he says there are really only two clear ways to know you have a future.

Both comments went viral, and it’s easy to see why. Companies are cutting jobs while pouring money into AI, and plenty of people are wondering whether their own role is next. The advice is worth hearing, but it’s also worth checking against what we actually know, because neither CEO offered much evidence, and both run companies that make money from AI.

01

Brian Chesky’s warning about AI layoffs

Chesky made his case on the Invest Like The Best podcast. His argument is that the main threat to office workers is a reluctance to adapt, not the technology itself.

He singled out one group in particular: managers whose job is mostly supervision. Routine check-ins, one-on-ones, scheduling and tracking projects are exactly the kind of coordination AI tools are starting to handle. In his view, those pure people-management roles will lose value.

What replaces them, Chesky says, is a hybrid leader who still leads a team but also does hands-on work, solves problems and helps build the product. He pointed to former Apple design chief Jony Ive as an example of someone who balanced real craft with building a strong team.

His tone was more upbeat than the headlines. Chesky said learning modern AI tools is straightforward for anyone with a growth mindset, meaning a willingness to keep learning rather than defending how things have always been done.

A workbench with woodworking tools and shavings
02

Alex Karp’s two paths: a trade or a different brain

Karp spoke on the TBPN podcast. In his telling, only two things reliably signal that a worker has a future once AI spreads: vocational training, or being neurodivergent. Coverage of his remarks listed ADHD, autism and dyslexia as examples. Karp is dyslexic himself.

The logic behind the first path is fairly clear. Skilled trades rely on hands-on, local, physical judgment that software can’t easily copy. The second is more about how people think. Karp said the person likely to succeed may be more of an artist, someone who comes at problems from a different direction and builds something unique.

Both routes steer clear of the busy center of desk work, where machines find standard, repeatable tasks easiest to copy.

03

Where the experts push back

Daniel Wendler, an autistic psychologist whose work focuses on neurodiversity, said Karp has a point, but a narrower one. If neurodivergent people aren’t in the room when teams tackle AI, those teams miss a perspective. That is an argument for including different thinkers, not a promise that they are safe from job cuts.

Wendler also made a practical point. Many offices are built around how most people work and overlook neurodivergent employees’ needs. Because those workers have often had to find workarounds, they may be among the keenest users of AI, which can break big assignments into smaller steps, organize tasks and help with communication.

He has also warned against the idea that every neurodivergent worker has a hidden superpower. That framing, he argues, ignores the real difficulties that come with conditions like ADHD and dyslexia. And the big claim, that neurodivergent people as a group will do better in an AI economy, has no data behind it in anything Karp or the coverage presented.

A notebook with a mind map next to a laptop
04

What these CEOs are actually doing

Words are cheap, so look at programs. Palantir runs a Neurodivergent Fellowship Program with a salary range of $110,000 to $200,000 a year, and its job ad says fellows face the same performance bar as other engineers. Other big employers have similar efforts, JPMorgan Chase, Dell and Microsoft among them, while the Autism at Work program at SAP has run for over ten years.

Neither CEO announced a new hiring policy, quota or layoff plan alongside these remarks. And both are selling something: Airbnb is building AI into how it runs, and Palantir sells data and AI software. Their predictions are also, in part, a pitch.

05

What you can do about AI layoffs this year

Strip away the hype and the two CEOs agree on more than it first seems. The safest place is away from work that is purely routine. Some practical steps:

  • Pick up the tools now. Spend an hour a week using AI assistants on real tasks in your job. Chesky’s point is that the learning curve is short if you start.
  • Add hands-on value. If you manage people, keep a piece of real work for yourself, whether that’s analysis, design, code or customer problems.
  • Make your angle visible. Karp’s artist idea rewards people who bring a different view. Show the unusual fixes and ideas you bring, not just the tasks you complete.
  • Don’t ignore the trades. Skilled, physical work is one area both CEOs’ logic says AI can’t easily copy.
  • Ask for what helps you work. If AI tools make your job easier because of how your brain works, say so. Employers are rethinking how work gets done anyway.
06

Quick answers

What did Brian Chesky say about AI and jobs?

He said workers who resist adapting, and managers who only supervise, face the biggest risk. He believes leaders will need to combine managing with hands-on work.

Why does Alex Karp think neurodivergent people will do well?

He says the AI era rewards people who think like artists and approach problems differently, which he links with neurodivergence. He offered no data to back it up.

Which jobs are safest from AI?

Neither CEO gave a list, but both point toward hands-on, skilled work and roles that need original thinking, rather than routine coordination.

You're reading the quick version.