The results are strong, with caveats. On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, an independent score that combines many tests, Muse Wonder Full scored 56. That ties Claude Sonnet 5.5 and beats GPT-6 Astra, Gemini 4 Argon and Claude Fable 5.1, which all scored 53. Only Claude Opus 5.5 ranked higher, at 58. The standard Muse Wonder model scored 52.
Wonder Full shines on long coding jobs. On a test called SWE-Marathon it scored 57.5, against 46.3 for Opus 5.5 and 42.5 for GPT-6 Astra. Meta also says it leads on some specialist tests, including work with legal documents.
It does not win everywhere. Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra both beat it on Terminal-Bench 4.0, a test of working in a computer’s command line, and Opus leads on health questions. When the code editor Cursor added Muse Wonder a few days after launch, it scored 46.1% on CursorBench in its High setting, or up to 50.4% at Max, solidly mid-pack next to Claude Opus 5.5’s leading 57.8%. Benchmarks are also not a perfect guide to how a model feels in daily use.