Friday, 30 October 2026

HHS will pay doctors to file VAERS reports on suspected harms

The plan adds an NIH vaccine-injury clinic, a VAERS overhaul and new health-record rules. Doctors and vaccine experts question what paid reporting will add.

National Institutes of Health, related to: HHS will pay doctors to file VAERS reports on suspected harms
Photo: PHScomms / CC BY-SA 4.0 (modified)

The short version

  • HHS plans to pay doctors for the time they spend filing suspected vaccine side-effect reports to VAERS.
  • An NIH clinic in Bethesda, Maryland, for people with health problems after vaccination quietly opened on October 5.
  • HHS will also update VAERS and require electronic health records to capture vaccine-related adverse events.
  • Many vaccine experts say VAERS reports are unverified and cannot show a vaccine caused a problem, and warn the plan may deepen confusion.
Quick read · 1 min

HHS, led by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., wants to pay doctors for their time when they report suspected vaccine injuries to VAERS, the federal reporting system. The proposal is part of a four-part plan that also includes a new NIH clinic for people with health problems after vaccination, an update to VAERS and a rule that health records log vaccine reactions.

Details are thin. HHS hasn't said how payments would work, and the clinic's budget, enrollment rules and review process are unpublished.

  • VAERS accepts unverified reports from anyone, so a report doesn't prove a vaccine caused harm.
  • Vaccine experts and the AMA warn the push may add confusion and lower trust.
  • Nothing changes yet about vaccine schedules or coverage.

Watch for a formal rule on paid reporting and for the clinic's research plan.

Doctors could soon be paid for filling out a government form that almost anyone can already submit for free. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), led by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., wants to reimburse physicians for reporting suspected vaccine injuries to VAERS, the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

It is one of four moves in a new HHS push on vaccine injuries, and it touches the data that shapes how Americans judge vaccine safety. More reports sound like more information. But VAERS is built to accept unverified claims, so the real question is whether paying for more of them produces better evidence or just a bigger pile of unchecked data. Here is what HHS announced and what experts say it will and won’t change for you.

01

What is in the HHS vaccine injuries VAERS initiative?

HHS laid out four parts in a press announcement the following Thursday:

  • Paid reporting. Doctors would be reimbursed for time spent submitting suspected vaccine-related injuries to VAERS. HHS says this will lower barriers and encourage more documentation.
  • A new NIH clinic. The National Institutes of Health has opened a clinic on its Bethesda, Maryland, campus to study and care for patients with health problems after vaccination.
  • A VAERS update. The reporting system itself will be changed to make it more accessible.
  • Health record rules. Electronic health records will be required to capture vaccine-related adverse events, which HHS says will give doctors a fuller patient history.

Kennedy framed the plan as a matter of listening to families. In the announcement, he said patients reporting injuries should not be dismissed and that the goal is to make vaccines safer and earn back trust in public health agencies.

A clinical facility related to vaccine safety research
02

How would doctors get paid for VAERS reports?

HHS hasn’t explained the details. A news report said the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which sets many billing rules, may create a new billing code so doctors can charge for the time. There is no published cost, no start date and no formal rule yet. The next sign of movement will be a proposal in formal rulemaking.

Some doctors question the need. One obstetrics professor who served on the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee said filing a VAERS report was not time consuming, and that being paid would be a nice perk but he sees reporting as a professional duty.

03

Why VAERS reports are not proof of harm

VAERS has been run jointly by the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration since 1990. It works like a wide net. Patients, family members, doctors and drug makers can all submit reports, and none are checked before they go in. That openness is deliberate: it helps officials spot rare warning signs early.

The trade-off is that a report is not evidence. The CDC says plainly on its website that a VAERS report does not mean a vaccine caused the problem, and its reviews find most reports are not actually linked to vaccination. Even so, the raw numbers are often cited by anti-vaccine activists, including in lawsuits seeking compensation, as if they proved danger.

VAERS is also only one layer. The CDC and FDA run several other systems, including V-safe, the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Project and the Vaccine Safety Datalink, which works with 13 sites to scan health record data each week for rare and serious problems. Supporters of the current setup point to the COVID-19 vaccines: these systems picked up myocarditis in young men at roughly 1 in 20,000 and blood clots tied to the Johnson and Johnson shot at about 1 in 500,000.

A clinician reviewing patient records for vaccine adverse events
04

What we still don’t know about the NIH clinic

The clinic opened on October 5 with a ribbon-cutting attended by Kennedy and other senior officials, but the opening was not publicly announced until later that week. A parents’ roundtable at the event featured families who believe their children were harmed by vaccines.

Key details are still missing. HHS has not published the clinic’s budget or funding source, how patients will be chosen, how many it will enroll, its research protocol, or who will review its findings. It is described as an observational site, meaning researchers follow patients rather than test treatments. That kind of research can describe symptoms, but on its own it usually can’t show that a vaccine caused a condition.

05

What this means for patients and parents

For now, nothing changes about vaccine schedules or insurance coverage. The clinic’s opening doesn’t alter any recommendation, and most side effects from shots are mild and pass quickly, the CDC says.

If you think you or your child had a reaction after a shot, you can already talk to a clinician and file a VAERS report yourself; you don’t need a doctor to do it. People who believe they were seriously injured can look into the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, a no-fault process handled through the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. Trouble breathing, swelling of the face or throat, or rapidly worsening symptoms after any vaccine need emergency care.

Critics worry about the bigger picture. The American Medical Association said investigating possible side effects is essential for trust, but warned that undermining confidence in vaccines will lower immunization rates and bring back preventable diseases. Several vaccine experts said the plan duplicates existing systems and may add confusion rather than knowledge. The announcement comes during the country’s largest measles outbreak in years, with more than 4,000 U.S. cases this year.

06

Quick answers

What is VAERS?

It’s a national early-warning system, run by the CDC and FDA, that collects unverified reports of health problems after vaccination from anyone who wants to file one.

Will paying doctors make vaccines safer?

HHS says more reporting will improve evidence. Many experts say unverified reports can’t show cause, so more of them won’t settle safety questions without proper studies.

Can I file a VAERS report myself?

Yes. Patients and family members can submit reports directly, and it’s a good idea to talk with a clinician about your symptoms too.

You're reading the quick version.